<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Guitar Tone Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buddyhawke.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buddyhawke.com</link>
	<description>Everything that Makes Guitar Awesome</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.buddyhawke.com/about/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 02:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-231</guid>
		<description>nice to see you doing well mR chabak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice to see you doing well mR chabak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mesa Single Rectifier by Chaz</title>
		<link>http://www.buddyhawke.com/guitar-amps-cabs/mesa-single-rectifier/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddyhawke.com/guitar-amps-cabs/mesa-single-rectifier/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Good post. I actually had 2 Mesa Boogie Dual Recto (100 watt version) sell at http://gear-vault.com. One was a 1999 and the other was a 1992 pre1000 blackface Dual Recto.  The 1999 Rectifier was REV G and the pre1000 Dual Recto was REV F. Let me tell you what, huge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. I actually had 2 Mesa Boogie Dual Recto (100 watt version) sell at <a href="http://gear-vault.com" rel="nofollow">http://gear-vault.com</a>. One was a 1999 and the other was a 1992 pre1000 blackface Dual Recto.  The 1999 Rectifier was REV G and the pre1000 Dual Recto was REV F. Let me tell you what, huge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.buddyhawke.com/about/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Thanks loads for the info Aaron,I'll definitely go with Duncans. I'm leaning more towards the '59 vintage since the website suggests it but is there anyway to actually try em w/o going through the hassle of changing the pickups themselves?
And is there a difference between the SH-5 or TB-5?(sound?specs?)will the SH-1 '59 fit in my LP well since its not a trembucker?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks loads for the info Aaron,I&#8217;ll definitely go with Duncans. I&#8217;m leaning more towards the &#8216;59 vintage since the website suggests it but is there anyway to actually try em w/o going through the hassle of changing the pickups themselves?<br />
And is there a difference between the SH-5 or TB-5?(sound?specs?)will the SH-1 &#8216;59 fit in my LP well since its not a trembucker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.buddyhawke.com/about/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Is there anyway I can contact you through email instead of this?I don't want to fill up this page with my questions. So when you say get the TB-5, does that mean I should use that in the bridge instead of the SH-5?Is there a significant difference between the two?I do love overdrive myself and have one of the Boss OD pedals.  I'll look into the Pearly Gates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anyway I can contact you through email instead of this?I don&#8217;t want to fill up this page with my questions. So when you say get the TB-5, does that mean I should use that in the bridge instead of the SH-5?Is there a significant difference between the two?I do love overdrive myself and have one of the Boss OD pedals.  I&#8217;ll look into the Pearly Gates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by buddyhawke</title>
		<link>http://www.buddyhawke.com/about/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>buddyhawke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-66</guid>
		<description>There is a world of difference between the EMG's and the Seymour Duncan's. Based on your musical tastes alone, Duncan pickups would be the way to go. The SH-5 Custom is a great pickup, and has quite a few options for neck pickups. The most important factor in choosing one would have to be the guitar's wood. The Epiphone Les Paul Customs have a mahogany body with an alder cap, and IMO sound a bit brighter than their Gibson counter parts. Give the SH-1 '59 humbucker or the SHPG-1 Pearly Gates humbucker a try. Both sound great in Les Paul's, and have a solid classic rock sound without getting too muddy. They will also have a much, much better clean tone than the active EMG in the neck position of the guitar. The Pearly Gates has a little more midrange sizzle, and sounds better with overdrive than the '59 IMO. Remember, Seymour Duncan offers the 21-day return policy if the tones you get aren't what you were hoping for.

*One tip for you, too. Be sure to get the TB-5 Custom (trembucker). The standard pickup size is a bit too small in Epiphones. The pole pieces in  the trembuckers line up almost perfect in the imported Epi's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a world of difference between the EMG&#8217;s and the Seymour Duncan&#8217;s. Based on your musical tastes alone, Duncan pickups would be the way to go. The SH-5 Custom is a great pickup, and has quite a few options for neck pickups. The most important factor in choosing one would have to be the guitar&#8217;s wood. The Epiphone Les Paul Customs have a mahogany body with an alder cap, and IMO sound a bit brighter than their Gibson counter parts. Give the SH-1 &#8216;59 humbucker or the SHPG-1 Pearly Gates humbucker a try. Both sound great in Les Paul&#8217;s, and have a solid classic rock sound without getting too muddy. They will also have a much, much better clean tone than the active EMG in the neck position of the guitar. The Pearly Gates has a little more midrange sizzle, and sounds better with overdrive than the &#8216;59 IMO. Remember, Seymour Duncan offers the 21-day return policy if the tones you get aren&#8217;t what you were hoping for.</p>
<p>*One tip for you, too. Be sure to get the TB-5 Custom (trembucker). The standard pickup size is a bit too small in Epiphones. The pole pieces in  the trembuckers line up almost perfect in the imported Epi&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.buddyhawke.com/about/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Hi,I'm a guitarist and have been at it for about 2 years. I recently got an Epi LP custom and am discontent with the stock PU's.I've been looking around and have come across the EMG 81/85 combo,which I've played thru my Cube 60. But I came across online the Duncan SH-5 custom's you use. I was wondering what duncan would go together well with that bridge PU and would it the SD combo suit well for my oldschool taste?(Metallica,Zeppelin,Gilmour,GNR,AC/DC)or would I be able to stick with the active 81/85? Thanks Aaron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,I&#8217;m a guitarist and have been at it for about 2 years. I recently got an Epi LP custom and am discontent with the stock PU&#8217;s.I&#8217;ve been looking around and have come across the EMG 81/85 combo,which I&#8217;ve played thru my Cube 60. But I came across online the Duncan SH-5 custom&#8217;s you use. I was wondering what duncan would go together well with that bridge PU and would it the SD combo suit well for my oldschool taste?(Metallica,Zeppelin,Gilmour,GNR,AC/DC)or would I be able to stick with the active 81/85? Thanks Aaron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Guitar Tuner by Chrissy</title>
		<link>http://www.buddyhawke.com/online-guitar-tuner/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrissy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddyhawke.com/blog/guitar-tuner/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>This helped alot!!! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This helped alot!!! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Epiphone Explorer by Michael Espino</title>
		<link>http://www.buddyhawke.com/guitar-info/epiphone-explorer/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Espino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddyhawke.com/blog/guitar-info/epiphone-explorer/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Hi! I'm just curious about the modifications you did on your explorer. How's the sound of the SD pick-ups on your guitar? I have a '58 Flying V and if I make the same MODS you did, would it make my guitar sound as sweet as your explorer as what you have said? Hey thanks for your posts you're a great help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I&#8217;m just curious about the modifications you did on your explorer. How&#8217;s the sound of the SD pick-ups on your guitar? I have a &#8216;58 Flying V and if I make the same MODS you did, would it make my guitar sound as sweet as your explorer as what you have said? Hey thanks for your posts you&#8217;re a great help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
